(These are a couple of the nasties from a WisconsinReporter article “Dems, GOP trade barbs as state reviews recall petitions”.)
When you need the people power to recall a Democratic Senator in Wisconsin. Who you gonna call? Not local Wisconsin volunteers. You won’t see 100’s of volunteers in a line circling the block the way they did on the first day to help with the Alberta Darling Recall.
You won’t see 100’s of volunteers trying to find a place to sit and stand as they jam offices across Wisconsin in an effort so popular and powerful that it exceeds the grassroots effort of Obama’s 2008 campaign.
Nope! You gotta call the recall for hire firm of Kennedy Enterprises out of Colorado.
“Kennedy Enterprises will work diligently to get people to sign your petition.”
From their site, these are their services:
- Review all signatures collected by each circulator making a good faith effort to determine their validity
- Provide weekly delivery of signatures and written reports on progress towards qualifying your inniative
- Validation of each batch of signatures, utilizing at least a 10% random sampling
- We guarantee that your negotiated contract rate will never increase for the duration of your campaign – more HERE
On facebook I am hearing this same story from volunteers who are verifying signatures against Democratic Senators:“Amazing how many of the circulators were from out of state, such as FL, CO, MO and OK to name a few. Funny, we didn’t need that kind of help getting sigs to recall the Repubs!”
Volunteers from Wisconsin who are committed to recalling Republicans are already amazed that Republicans can not find their own local volunteer help. I think it just boggles the mind to think that when Republicans pay for this sort of help, they aren’t getting somebody decent.
According to ballotpedia, Kennedy Enterprises “circulators have associated themselves with benefits for the fire department [in a local Colorado effort] even though the fire department would not benefit nor is associated with the petition. The group works for Kennedy Enterprises. According to the Colorado Springs Gazette, Kennedy Enterprises was involved in an Indiana investigation in 2000 for placing the names of four people who had died on a petition drive to get then-Republican candidate Gary Bauer onto the state’s presidential primary ballot.” – More at 9news.com
Well. People DO die. I thought, perhaps, there’s an explanation. Maybe in a big signature campaign, someone dies who was alive 1 week ago.” But in the year 2000 Indiana case, the first dead person signature was caught by a clerk who knew that the man, Glen Barnett, had died 6 years previous.
As for the three other signatures: Arnold Moser had been dead 16 years, Lawrence Eberle had been dead for 23 years, and Hershel Engleman had been dead for 25 years. source
Did somebody say to old widows- “Go ahead and write down your dead husband’s name, while you’re at it?”
(there’s audio at that link which is just sad.)
Republicans contend that the discovery of Bill Pocan’s signature on the recall petition against Democratic state Sen. Bob Wirch is a stunt conducted by the Dems.
Bill Pocan was the father of state Rep. Mark Pocan and he died nearly two decades ago.
Smells of deeply hateful Republican bullshit to me. It would be easier to turn me into a 911 truther than to convince me that any Dem would put Mark Pocan’s father’s name on such a document.
Interesting that the signature of Mark Pocan’s deceased father turns up on Wirch’s recall, it being the same recall effort that used booze shots to gain signatures.
Side note- a D.C. group called Fieldworks has consulted on the WI Democratic side. But the door-to-door manpower came from homegrown volunteers.
Oshkosh Professor Solicits for Recall Signatures and More in the Classroom
I am very much in support of Progressives and the Dems. However this action from “our side” irks me.
An Oshkosh professor, Stephen Richards, takes 8 minutes out of class time subtly stumping for the recall of Hopper and yakking about how Republican politics will affect salaries and more inside the classroom. A student recorded the incident- Audio Link Here
It’s skating closely to a conflict of interest. He says “there will be an 8% pay cut for all faculty and staff”. He’s speaking about something which impacts his compensation while at the same time, the audience listening is paying for his time there.
I would feel more comfortable with this if he asked the students to debate the topic – to challenge. But the students seem to have a passive role.
UW Oshkosh’s chancellor said the school would “implement agreed-upon corrective action”.
Let’s say I were the student, I would simply speak up and ask the teacher to get back to work on what I’d paid him to do.
Are these students overly polite? Nobody told him he was out of line directly? They should speak up.